|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 140-144
A retrospective review of phyllodes tumor of breast treated with multimodality approach: Experience of a tertiary care institution in Eastern India
Harris Mahammad Sepai1, Pratyusha Mukherjee1, Anis Bandyopadhyay2, Bidisha Naskar Ghosh3
1 Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Department of Radiotherapy, NRS Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
3 Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of R G Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
|Date of Submission||07-Feb-2022|
|Date of Decision||01-May-2022|
|Date of Acceptance||05-May-2022|
|Date of Web Publication||06-Dec-2022|
Dr. Anis Bandyopadhyay
Department of Radiotherapy, NRS Medical College and Hospital, 138 AJC Bose Road, Kolkata - 700 014, West Bengal
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: The cornerstone of management of phyllodes tumor is surgery. No standard of care exists regarding adjuvant therapy; however, local recurrence is a predominant pattern of failure. The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment patterns of phyllodes tumor and to compare local recurrence and disease-free survival rates of patients with borderline and malignant phyllodes tumor treated with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the demographic data, treatment details, and recurrence patterns of all patients with nonmetastatic phyllodes tumors of the breast (n = 34) treated with a multimodality approach who presented to our institute from January 2015 to December 2020. Results: The median age at presentation was 41.2 years, and the median tumor size was 12.5 cm. All patients underwent definitive surgical procedures in the form of wide local excision or mastectomy. No recurrence was noted in the patients with a benign histology. After a median follow-up period of 38 months, the local recurrence rate was 27% for the patients with borderline and malignant histology treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 11) versus 47% for those (n = 17) who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy. The 3-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 72% in the adjuvant radiotherapy group, versus 51% in the surgery only group. Conclusion: The results of the current study confirm the excellent prognosis of patients with benign phyllodes tumor undergoing surgery alone. Local recurrence was the predominant mode of failure in the patients with borderline and malignant histology. Locoregional control was improved with the addition of postoperative radiotherapy in the patients with borderline and malignant histology irrespective of margin status.
Keywords: Adjuvant radiotherapy, borderline phyllodes, breast tumor, malignant phyllodes, phyllodes tumor
|How to cite this article:|
Sepai HM, Mukherjee P, Bandyopadhyay A, Ghosh BN. A retrospective review of phyllodes tumor of breast treated with multimodality approach: Experience of a tertiary care institution in Eastern India. J Cancer Res Pract 2022;9:140-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Sepai HM, Mukherjee P, Bandyopadhyay A, Ghosh BN. A retrospective review of phyllodes tumor of breast treated with multimodality approach: Experience of a tertiary care institution in Eastern India. J Cancer Res Pract [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 4];9:140-4. Available from: https://www.ejcrp.org/text.asp?2022/9/4/140/362632
| Introduction|| |
Phyllodes tumor of the breast is a rare fibroepithelial lesion comprising 0.3%–0.5% of female breast tumors. The incidence of the tumor is 2.1 per million, and it usually occurs in females aged 42–45 years,, which is about 15–20 years later than the usual presentation with fibroadenoma of the breast. Phyllodes tumor of the breast is comparatively rare among adolescents and the elderly. The term cystosarcoma phyllodes, which is the benign variant of phyllodes tumor, was coined by Johannes Muller in 1838, due to the cystic, fleshy, and leafy gross appearance of the tumor. The metastatic, or rather malignant counterpart, was reported by Lee and Pack in 1931. In 1981, the WHO adopted the term phyllodes tumor.
Phyllodes tumors are classified into benign, borderline, and malignant grade categories depending on the degree of stromal cellularity and atypia, mitotic count, stromal overgrowth, and nature of the tumor margins. The overlap between fibroadenoma and phyllodes raises the question of pathological kinship. The stromal elements play a key role in distinguishing phyllodes tumors from fibroadenomas and benign tumors from malignant phyllodes tumors.
Clinically phyllodes tumor often presents as a rapidly growing breast lump. Nipple retraction and ulceration are uncommon, and it is rarely bilateral. The median size of a phyllodes tumor is around 4 cm, and 20% of tumors grow larger than 10 cm (arbitrary cutoff size for the designation of a giant phyllodes tumor). They have been reported to reach a maximum size of 40 cm.
Phyllodes tumors are usually treated with local surgical excision with tumor-free margins of 1 cm or greater. Lumpectomy or partial mastectomy is the preferred surgical therapy. Total mastectomy is necessary only if negative margins cannot be obtained by lumpectomy or partial mastectomy. Since phyllodes tumors rarely metastasize to the axillary lymph nodes, surgical axillary staging or axillary lymph node dissection is not usually performed unless clinically indicated.
The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in the management of phyllodes tumor is controversial, and no further adjuvant treatment is warranted after margin-negative surgical resection of benign phyllodes tumors. However, in borderline and malignant tumors, a few retrospective studies have reported favorable outcomes with adjuvant radiotherapy, particularly when a wide resection margin was not achieved during surgery.,
The present analysis was undertaken to review our institutional experience with phyllodes tumors and to investigate clinical practice in the management of these uncommon and unpredictable breast tumors. This retrospective analysis includes long-term outcomes in terms of local recurrence and disease-free survival (DFS) rates.
| Materials and Methods|| |
A retrospective audit of all patients with phyllodes tumor who presented from January 2015 to December 2020 to the radiotherapy department of a tertiary care hospital in Kolkata was undertaken. The study received ethical clearance from the IPGME and R Research Oversight Committee (Institutional Ethics Committee for research involving human participants), with IRB Number: IPGMER/IEC/2022/081. Histopathologically proven cases of phyllodes tumor who underwent curative treatment in the form of surgery alone or followed by adjuvant radiation were considered. Data were collected with regard to age, presentation, histological diagnosis, treatment, recurrence, and follow-up details. Thirty-six patients presented with phyllodes tumors during the study period, of whom 2 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 34 patients were analyzed. Adjuvant radiotherapy was defined as any radiation received after the first or subsequent radical surgery. Disease-free interval was calculated from date of definitive surgery.
Descriptive analyses were conducted on patient demographics, pathological features, and treatment characteristics. Continuous variables were summarized as mean and range; categorical variables were summarized as n and percentage (%). Local recurrence-free survival and DFS rates were calculated and displayed with Kaplan–Meier curves.
| Results|| |
All of the 34 patients were treated with definitive surgical procedures. The tumors were classified as being malignant in 19 (56%) patients, borderline in nine (26%) patients, and benign in six (18%) patients. The average age of the patients was 41.2 years. Seven (21%) patients presented with recurrent phyllodes tumors, of whom 6 had malignant phyllodes tumors [Table 1].
|Table 1: Patient, tumor and treatment characteristics stratified according to the pathologic subtype.|
Click here to view
Five (15%) of the 34 patients underwent breast conservation surgery, and 29 (85%) patients underwent mastectomy at initial presentation due to the large size of the tumor. The average maximum dimensions of the malignant, borderline, and benign phyllodes tumors were 13 cm, 11 cm, and 12.8 cm, respectively [Table 1]. Of these 29 patients, 15 underwent additional axillary dissection. Margins were positive in eight (24%) patients, close in four (12%) patients, and free in 20 (59%) patients. Margin status was unknown in two patients. Of the 15 patients who underwent axillary dissection, none had positive axillary lymph nodes.
Adjuvant radiotherapy was given to 12 (35%) of the 34 patients, of whom 9 had malignant tumors and 2 had borderline tumors. Only one patient with benign histology was treated with adjuvant radiotherapy in view of positive margins for which revision surgery was not possible. Four (36%) of 11 patients with malignant and borderline histology who received adjuvant radiotherapy had either close or positive margins. Six (35%) of 17 patients with malignant and borderline histology who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy had close or positive margins [Table 2]. All patients received at least 50 Gy in conventional fractionation except for 1 who was treated with a hypofractionated regimen. One patient received an additional 10 Gy boost to the tumor bed.
|Table 2: Patient, treatment and tumor characteristics stratified according to radiotherapy administration in borderline/malignant phyllodes tumors.|
Click here to view
Five of the 34 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, all of whom had malignant histology [Table 1]. The patients usually received 6 cycles of chemotherapy and a combination chemotherapy based on alkylating agents and anthracyclines was preferred.
After a median follow-up of 38 months, nine (47%) patients with malignant histology and 2 (22%) with borderline histology developed local recurrence [Table 3]. No local recurrence was noted in the patients with benign phyllodes. Two patients with malignant phyllodes developed lung metastasis in the absence of local recurrence [Table 3]. Further staging workup in 8 patients who developed local recurrence revealed the presence of distant metastasis, and they were mostly treated with palliative chemotherapy. The response to palliative chemotherapy was dismal, and the patients died 3–9 months after the detection of distant metastasis.
Three (27%) of 11 patients with a high-risk variety (malignant or borderline histology) who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy developed local recurrence. Eight (47%) of 17 patients with a similar histology who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy developed local recurrence [Table 4]. The patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy had better 3-year local recurrence-free survival [Figure 1] compared to the patients who did not (72% vs. 51%, P = not significant). The 3-year DFS rate in the adjuvant radiotherapy group was 64% versus 47% in the surgery only group, although the difference was not statistically significant [Figure 2].
|Figure 1: LRFS in relation to adjuvant radiotherapy administration in the borderline/malignant group. LRFS: Local recurrence free survival|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: DFS in relation to adjuvant radiotherapy administration in the borderline/malignant group. DFS: Disease free survival|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Treatment outcome stratified according to radiotherapy administration in borderline/malignant phyllodes tumors.|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Phyllodes tumors are rare fibroepithelial breast tumors with diverse biological behavior occurring in relatively young women compared with adenocarcinoma of the breast. In our study, the median age at presentation was 41.2 years, which is comparable with worldwide statistics.,, The median tumor size was 12.5 cm, which is consistent with the findings of Mallick et al. The largest tumor size in our series was 24 cm [Figure 3], representing a giant phyllodes tumor. However, in developed countries, the median size is 4–7 cm., This reflects delayed presentation in the Indian population.
Only 18% of our patients presented with benign phyllodes, while in many series, benign phyllodes has accounted for 50% of phyllodes tumors. This may be explained by the reluctance of general surgeons operating on benign phyllodes to refer patients to radiation oncology departments for follow-up, since the perceived risk of recurrence is low among this group.
In our cohort, 5 (15%) patients underwent breast conserving surgery. The median tumor size in these cases was 14 cm. Barth et al. reported that breast conserving surgery was a successful modality for surgical management in tumors with a mean size of 3.7 cm. In our series, margins were close/positive in three patients, and none were re-excised. All three patients developed recurrence, which suggests a more judicious selection of breast conserving surgery over mastectomy. Of the 29 patients who underwent mastectomy, 15 were treated additionally with axillary dissection, and none showed any lymph node involvement. Phyllodes tumor is not known to metastasize to the regional lymph nodes,,, and hence multiple reaction monitoring should only be reserved for clinically detected positive axillary node cases.
Adjuvant radiotherapy decreased the likelihood of local recurrence in our patients with borderline/malignant histology. In these patients, the rate of local recurrence in those treated with adjuvant radiotherapy was 27% (3 of 11 patients) compared to 47% (8 of 17 patients) for those who did not receive radiotherapy. Several studies have described the successful use of adjuvant radiotherapy in small numbers of patients after margin-positive mastectomies.,, In these studies, adjuvant radiotherapy was used only for close margin or positive cases. However, in our study, the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy was seen irrespective of the margin status, as both patients with close and positive margins were equally distributed in surgery only and surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy groups (35% vs. 36%). The only prospective study available to date by Barth et al. demonstrated that margin-negative wide local excision combined with adjuvant radiotherapy was an effective therapy for the local control of borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors.
After a median follow-up of 38 months, the local recurrence rate was 32%, which is higher than the recurrence rate reported in previous studies (8%–19%).,, Our findings can be explained by the fact that the proportion of patients with benign histology was much lower compared to the other histologic subtypes. Two patient developed distant metastasis during follow-up. The reported rates of distant metastasis range from 2.4% to 7.5%.,,
Eight of 11 patients who developed local recurrence were also found to have distant metastasis, mostly in the lungs. Thus, we suggest that it is critical to reduce local recurrence to prevent distant metastasis.
There are some limitations to this study. As the information was collected retrospectively, this study is liable to selection bias. In addition, as our institute is a tertiary care center, many patients with malignant phyllodes were referred for definitive surgery and radiotherapy, thus influencing the proportion of malignant to benign phyllodes tumors. Moreover, the sample size was small and follow-up duration was relatively short, which may have led to the study being underpowered, thus preventing us from clarifying the role of other prognostic factors to guide the use of adjuvant radiotherapy.
| Conclusion|| |
Phyllodes tumor of the breast comprises a heterogeneous group of tumors with unpredictable outcomes. Surgical resection (breast conserving surgery/mastectomy) is the primary modality of treatment for all histological subtypes. The size of the tumor dictates the choice of surgery, as shown in this study. Benign phyllodes tumor portends an excellent prognosis with margin-negative surgical resection. The addition of radiotherapy postoperatively in the patients with borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors reduced the rate of local recurrence irrespective of margin status. Our experience supports the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors irrespective of margin status.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Rowell MD, Perry RR, Hsiu JG, Barranco SC. Phyllodes tumors. Am J Surg 1993;165:376-9.
Salvadori B, Cusumano F, Del Bo R, Delledonne V, Grassi M, Rovini D, et al.
Surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast. Cancer 1989;63:2532-6.
Bernstein L, Deapen D, Ross RK. The descriptive epidemiology of malignant cystosarcoma phyllodes tumors of the breast. Cancer 1993;71:3020-4.
Oberman HA. Cystosarcoma phyllodes; a clinicopathologic study of hypercellular periductal stromal neoplasms of breast. Cancer 1965;18:697-710.
Müller J. Über den feineren Ban und die Formen der Krankaften Geschwulste. Berlin: G Reiner 1838;1:54-57.
Lee BJ, Pack GT. Giant intracanalicular myxoma of the breast: The so-called cystosarcoma phyllodes mammae of Johannes Muller. Ann Surg 1931;93:250-68.
Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Breast. Lyon: IARC Press; 2012.
Norris HJ, Taylor HB. Relationship of histologic features to behavior of cystosarcoma phyllodes. Analysis of ninety-four cases. Cancer 1967;20:2090-9.
Reinfuss M, Mituś J, Duda K, Stelmach A, Ryś J, Smolak K. The treatment and prognosis of patients with phyllodes tumor of the breast: An analysis of 170 cases. Cancer 1996;77:910-6.
Chaney AW, Pollack A, McNeese MD, Zagars GK, Pisters PW, Pollock RE, et al.
Primary treatment of cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast. Cancer 2000;89:1502-11.
Mangi AA, Smith BL, Gadd MA, Tanabe KK, Ott MJ, Souba WW. Surgical management of phyllodes tumors. Arch Surg 1999;134:487-92.
Boutrus RR, Khair S, Abdelazim Y, Nasr S, Ibraheem MH, Farahat A, et al.
Phyllodes tumors of the breast: Adjuvant radiation therapy revisited. Breast 2021;58:1-5.
Barth RJ Jr., Wells WA, Mitchell SE, Cole BF. A prospective, multi-institutional study of adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of malignant phyllodes tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:2288-94.
Belkacémi Y, Bousquet G, Marsiglia H, Ray-Coquard I, Magné N, Malard Y, et al.
Phyllodes tumor of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;70:492-500.
Barrio AV, Clark BD, Goldberg JI, Hoque LW, Bernik SF, Flynn LW, et al.
Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes of 293 phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:2961-70.
Tavassoli FA, Devilee P. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and femalegenital organs. In: World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Lyons: IARC Press; 2003. p. 99.
Mallick S, Joshi NP, Roy S, Gandhi AK, Pandit S, Sharma D, et al.
Malignant and borderline phyllodes tumor of breast treated with a multi-modality approach in a tertiary cancer care centre in North India. South Asian J Cancer 2016;5:1-3.
] [Full text]
McGregor GI, Knowling MA, Este FA. Sarcoma and Cystosarcoma phyllodes tumors of the breast – A retrospective review of 58 cases. Am J Surg 1994;167:477-80.
Macdonald OK, Lee CM, Tward JD, Chappel CD, Gaffney DK. Malignant phyllodes tumor of the female breast: Association of primary therapy with cause-specific survival from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Cancer 2006;107:2127-33.
Joshi SC, Sharma DN, Bahadur AK, Maurya R, Kumar S, Khurana N. Cystosarcoma phyllodes: Our institutional experience. Australas Radiol 2003;47:434-7.
Kleer CG, Giordano TJ, Braun T, Oberman HA. Pathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of benign and malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast. Mod Pathol 2001;14:185-90.
Calhoun KE, Lawton TJ, Kim JN, Lehman CD, Anderson BO. Phyllodes tumors. In: Harris J, Lippman ME, Osborne CK, Morrow M, editors. Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 781-92.
Ben Hassouna J, Damak T, Gamoudi A, Chargui R, Khomsi F, Mahjoub S, et al.
Phyllodes tumors of the breast: A case series of 106 patients. Am J Surg 2006;192:141-7.
Tan PH, Jayabaskar T, Chuah KL, Lee HY, Tan Y, Hilmy M, et al.
Phyllodes tumors of the breast: The role of pathologic parameters. Am J Clin Pathol 2005;123:529-40.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]